I've never believed that God created man with just a nod or a snap of his fingers.
Several teachings about the Creation of the Universe point out that some sort of Supreme Being just got it into Its head to say, "Hey, I've created the earth in--what, two, three, six, seven days? Maybe I'd better put something in there to populate it". And just like that--the first man and woman rise up from the ground. It all happens by rote, since no one argues that a Supreme Creator, after all, is imbued with such infinite power and ability that it only takes a thought from this Creator to make anything suddenly come to be.
And yet, empirical science has categorically proven that the whole human race is the product of a long process of evolution. The development of the human organism was only achieved after about 4 billion years during which life on earth passed through several stages before reaching the pinnacle we call homo sapiens. Which would mean that the Creator, most likely, must have first experimented with single-celled biological creations, then moved on to make more complex life forms when the Creator found the former less satisfactory. Mind you, this whole process took a lot more time that simply one day ( again, 4 billion years or so, in fact ), and more than a few hits and misses with paramecium, then trilobites, then dinosaurs, and then whatnot, before settling on humanity as the "perfect" creation.
The late Herbert W. Armstrong, the founder of the Worldwide Church of God in the United States, himself an extremely prolific evangelical writer, once argued in one of his dissertations that the sheer "perfection" of the human specimen was pure unarguable proof of the existence of a Creator. He states that we humans would dare not think of such a specimen of sophisticated electronic technology as a personal desktop computer as having spontaneously risen up from the ground. No one in his right mind would think that a personal desktop computer could rise up from the sands of the earth by itself by rote. All personal computers have been created, he argues. Ergo, so was the human species, which could be regarded as even more technically superior than any computer...of course.
Still, there would also be nothing ungracious nor perhaps blasphemous in thinking that perhaps the Creator may not have stumbled upon Its so far "perfect" creation in so little instance as one day. What if the Creator did take some time before he managed to fashion the first man and woman? What would be improper or derogatory in the logic of a Creator having had Its generous share of trials and errors towards the creation of Man, much like human scientists and inventors had with computers? What if perfection, after all, had never been a static and steady event but a state of constant improvement?
What if it turns out that we, humans all of us whatever color or shade of skin and eyes and hair, were in fact the product of a meticulous labor of love by a master Artist which continually improved on Its work over and over again in the space of eons?
Humans, for the most part, are creators themselves. And in this capacity, it is certainly apparent that in our quest to make the best products of our efforts at creating all sorts of things, we make sure to improve upon each of them simply for the sake of reaching ever higher and vaster possibilities. And all improvements take time. To bring into mind once again this wondrous human invention we call the personal desktop computer, isn't it a fact that humans continually improve upon its capabilities day after day, year after year, so much so that its potentials for function and performance would appear limitless? Perhaps the Supreme Creator does the same with all Creation? And what if this same Creator takes even more time to make Its improvements with Its more vastly complex inventions?If this were truly so, then it wouldn't be that much of a stretch of the imagination to think that, yes, perhaps humans did have primate ancestors, as Sir Charles Darwin supposed. And it would not dehumanize humans at all. Such an accounting of a tremendous effort on the Creator's part would, on the contrary, raise us humans up to the level of the infinite. For is it not that when an artist, or sculptor, or inventor, or loving parent, for that matter, devotes such divine effort into perfecting his or her creation or child ( or even brainchild ) over and over again without fail or hesitation, the resulting effort would be something unfathomably, spectacularly beyond all expectations? Evolution over millions of years, then, may yet be the greatest expression of the Creator's infinite love for everything in the universe.
Would that all philosophies embrace the dynamic of such a paradigm! It would impress upon everyone that every person they meet, whether beggar, street urchin, cosmopolitan executive, showbiz celebrity, or whoever, carries within him or her such an inestimable worth. Each of us, it turns out, is not the product of nine months in the womb. We are all the children of over four billion years of a Creator's efforts. In a world where we value 500-year-old antique vases, 5,000-year-old pyramids, even 200-year-old wines, it is possible we might be missing out on the value of even the lowliest unwanted child. For how does any creation finished in a day compare to a whole race of living beings carefully nurtured after for four billion years?
How could anybody think of even harming a hair of anyone else, much less intend of the death or dismemberment of any other person, if everyone thought this way?
( continued in next blog... "And 4 Billion Years After" )